The problem lies in finding evidence of this agreement.
It is a little like convincing a teacher or an examiner of your knowledge of
the law (or anything else). Evidence is required of your knowledge in an agreed
way. Through case law a pattern has evolved of finding evidence of agreement,
and it is by requiring the parties to have communicated in some way, one of
them making an offer and the other making an acceptance.
The benefit obtained or ‘bargained’ If offer
and acceptance were the only requirements, we could in theory have some very
one-sided agreements. If I offer to give you a present of £20 next week, and
you agree to this, we have an offer from me and an acceptance from you. If I
then do not give anything at all next week, I will have broken my promise. Is
this something that the law should enforce? The law is quite strict on not
generally enforcing one-sided promises, feeling that it becomes very much a
problem of morals when people break such promises.
The law will, however, enforce an agreement
if something has been bargained by both parties, and both sides have contributed
to the agreement in a recognisable way, for example by paying in exchange for
goods. This does not have to be the actual handing over of goods, so a promise
to pay could be given in exchange for the promise to hand over goods.
This exchange is known as consideration, and
is another requirement in forming a contract. CHAR_C02.QXD 14/9/07 10:36 Page 5
The intention to be bound by the agreement A third requirement is that the
parties do really intend to be bound by whatever they agree.
In a shopping context this is likely to go
without saying, as a seller is unlikely to intend to give away goods without
really expecting payment! However, if I offer to pay for my friend’s drink if
he buys my sandwich, I do not seriously expect to sue him if he only buys his
own sandwich.
To
distinguish between serious contracts and social agreements the law requires an
element of legal intention in forming a contract. Capacity A further factor to
consider in the legality of a contract is whether the parties are of the standing
required by the law to make a binding agreement. If a child in a playground
agrees to sell one of his toys, this would not normally be binding.
The law requires a legal capacity to
contract, and generally adults over the age of 18 are said to have this. A
further formation requirement examined in this part of the book, then, is the
capacity to contract. If all four of these requirements are present, then there
will normally be a binding contract.
Comments
Post a Comment